【普法课堂】开网店“一件代发”？暗藏侵权害处需小心！
<p style="font-size: 16px; color: black; line-height: 40px; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 15px;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="color: black;">近年来，“淘宝”“拼多多”等电商平台上无货源店铺商家开店侵权案件频发，卖家自以为“一件代发”无库存就能稳赚不赔，即使出问题<span style="color: black;">亦</span>不需要担责，殊不知<span style="color: black;">最后</span>“赔了夫人又折兵”。</span></span></p>
<div style="color: black; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 10px;"><img src="https://p3-sign.toutiaoimg.com/tos-cn-i-qvj2lq49k0/691c561e5fb64e9fa0cd3a179a5f25b8~noop.image?_iz=58558&from=article.pc_detail&lk3s=953192f4&x-expires=1722577291&x-signature=Z%2Fbm%2FbI7q3P%2FjcZCuIvfehY5urw%3D" style="width: 50%; margin-bottom: 20px;"></div>
<p style="font-size: 16px; color: black; line-height: 40px; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 15px;"><span style="color: black;"><strong style="color: blue;"><span style="color: black;">基本案情：</span></strong></span></p>
<p style="font-size: 16px; color: black; line-height: 40px; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 15px;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="color: black;">上海某<span style="color: black;">机构</span><span style="color: black;">得到</span>某旋转书架的外观设计专利权实施许可，上海某<span style="color: black;">机构</span>经调查<span style="color: black;">发掘</span>，鹤壁某<span style="color: black;">机构</span>在“拼多多”平台上<span style="color: black;">经过</span>其开设的“某机电专营店”，<span style="color: black;">营销</span>一款<span style="color: black;">制品</span>的链接名<span style="color: black;">叫作</span>为“实木360度旋转书架”。2022年12月份，上海某<span style="color: black;">机构</span><span style="color: black;">拜托</span><span style="color: black;">相关</span>人员从“某机电专营店”购买前述<span style="color: black;">制品</span>一个，并将该<span style="color: black;">制品</span>与涉案外观设计专利进行比对，<span style="color: black;">发掘</span>该<span style="color: black;">制品</span>的设计特征与授权外观设计的设计特征相比虽有<span style="color: black;">必定</span>差别，但并<span style="color: black;">无</span>改变整体视觉效果，应属于基本相同的外观设计。上海某<span style="color: black;">机构</span>认为鹤壁某<span style="color: black;">机构</span>存在侵犯其专利权的<span style="color: black;">行径</span>，隧诉至法院。</span></span></p>
<p style="font-size: 16px; color: black; line-height: 40px; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 15px;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="color: black;">鹤壁某<span style="color: black;">机构</span>辩<span style="color: black;">叫作</span>其是拼多多无货源店铺，消费者下单后再由鹤壁某<span style="color: black;">机构</span>在第三方店铺下单购买相同<span style="color: black;">制品</span>，直接由第三方店铺发货给消费者。鹤壁某<span style="color: black;">机构</span>并<span style="color: black;">无</span>见过<span style="color: black;">营销</span>实物，其不<span style="color: black;">晓得</span><span style="color: black;">营销</span>的<span style="color: black;">制品</span>侵害原告上海某<span style="color: black;">机构</span>的外观设计专利权，<span style="color: black;">需求</span>免除赔偿责任。</span></span></p>
<p style="font-size: 16px; color: black; line-height: 40px; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 15px;"><span style="color: black;"><strong style="color: blue;"><span style="color: black;">法院判决：</span></strong></span></p>
<p style="font-size: 16px; color: black; line-height: 40px; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 15px;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="color: black;">鹤壁中院经审理认为，被诉侵权<span style="color: black;">制品</span>的设计特征与授权外观设计的设计特征相比虽有<span style="color: black;">必定</span>差别，但并<span style="color: black;">无</span>改变整体视觉效果，应属于基本相同的外观设计。<span style="color: black;">因为</span>本案被诉侵权<span style="color: black;">制品</span>与外观设计专利<span style="color: black;">制品</span>属于相同<span style="color: black;">制品</span>，<span style="color: black;">因此呢</span>被诉侵权<span style="color: black;">制品</span>落入了本案外观设计专利权的<span style="color: black;">守护</span>范围，构<span style="color: black;">成为了</span>对涉案外观设计专利权的侵权。鹤壁某<span style="color: black;">机构</span>在其经营的网店中有展示被诉侵权<span style="color: black;">制品</span>图片，<span style="color: black;">拥有</span><span style="color: black;">营销</span>被诉侵权<span style="color: black;">制品</span>的意思<span style="color: black;">暗示</span>，鹤壁某<span style="color: black;">机构</span>存在许诺<span style="color: black;">营销</span>、<span style="color: black;">营销</span>被诉侵权<span style="color: black;">制品</span>的<span style="color: black;">行径</span>。据此，综合考量涉案专利权类型、鹤壁某<span style="color: black;">机构</span>侵权<span style="color: black;">行径</span>的性质和情节、上海某<span style="color: black;">机构</span>为制止侵权<span style="color: black;">行径</span>所支付的<span style="color: black;">恰当</span>开支等<span style="color: black;">原因</span>，<span style="color: black;">最后</span>确定赔偿数额为人民币8000元。</span></span></p>
<div style="color: black; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 10px;"><img src="https://p3-sign.toutiaoimg.com/tos-cn-i-qvj2lq49k0/10d21cf4c7d74c3a84cbe6fb2841eec7~noop.image?_iz=58558&from=article.pc_detail&lk3s=953192f4&x-expires=1722577291&x-signature=E5EaFF9JP2IT%2FO7plU7MUaUJT1I%3D" style="width: 50%; margin-bottom: 20px;"></div>
<p style="font-size: 16px; color: black; line-height: 40px; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 15px;"><span style="color: black;"><strong style="color: blue;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="color: black;">典型<span style="color: black;">道理</span></span></span></strong></span></p>
<div style="color: black; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 10px;"><img src="https://p3-sign.toutiaoimg.com/tos-cn-i-qvj2lq49k0/f057814654cb467786f49878fec1d54a~noop.image?_iz=58558&from=article.pc_detail&lk3s=953192f4&x-expires=1722577291&x-signature=pM78KGV0iryj2GNNzmKWrELbiJw%3D" style="width: 50%; margin-bottom: 20px;"></div>
<div style="color: black; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 10px;"><img src="https://p26-sign.toutiaoimg.com/tos-cn-i-qvj2lq49k0/e0dffc8307944370a00d63a237cf5b9d~noop.image?_iz=58558&from=article.pc_detail&lk3s=953192f4&x-expires=1722577291&x-signature=BuPM2xWbLrsHAH25mWCYHsyWZcc%3D" style="width: 50%; margin-bottom: 20px;"></div>
<p style="font-size: 16px; color: black; line-height: 40px; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 15px;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="color: black;">“一件代发”是一种新型的网络经营模式，因其模式兼具“中间商赚差价”的安全性和低成本、<span style="color: black;">有效</span>率的<span style="color: black;">方便</span>性，受到电子商务经营者的<span style="color: black;">喜爱</span>。在这种模式下经营者容易忽略对<span style="color: black;">制品</span><span style="color: black;">源自</span>合法性的审查，卖家<span style="color: black;">常常</span>认为商品由上家<span style="color: black;">营销</span>，只要自己能说明购买合法<span style="color: black;">源自</span>就无须承担赔偿责任。</span></span></p>
<p style="font-size: 16px; color: black; line-height: 40px; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 15px;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="color: black;">按照</span>法律规定，<span style="color: black;">营销</span>方理应对自己<span style="color: black;">营销</span>的<span style="color: black;">制品</span><span style="color: black;">状况</span>进行<span style="color: black;">认识</span>，尽到<span style="color: black;">恰当</span>的审查义务，如能说明合法<span style="color: black;">源自</span>，可<span style="color: black;">以避免</span>除赔偿责任，但应当支付<span style="color: black;">恰当</span>开支<span style="color: black;">花费</span>。<span style="color: black;">因此呢</span>，经营者在采用该模式时，应审查“代发人”的合法资质，<span style="color: black;">需求</span>其<span style="color: black;">供给</span>生产、<span style="color: black;">营销</span>以及商品上<span style="color: black;">运用</span>的商标、专利等授权文件，<span style="color: black;">同期</span>审查商品<span style="color: black;">是不是</span>属于“三无<span style="color: black;">制品</span>”等，降低经营<span style="color: black;">危害</span>。</span></span></p>
<p style="font-size: 16px; color: black; line-height: 40px; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 15px;"><span style="color: black;"><span style="color: black;">（编写人：王建霞 朱军舰）</span></span></p>
这夸赞甜到心里，让我感觉温暖无比。 楼主继续加油啊！外链论坛加油！ 论坛外链网http://www.fok120.com/ 对于这个问题，我有不同的看法...
页:
[1]