外媒：苹果应用商店27%佣金计划受美地区法官质疑
<p style="font-size: 16px; color: black; line-height: 40px; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 15px;"><span style="color: black;">源自</span>：环球网 </p>
<p style="font-size: 16px; color: black; line-height: 40px; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 15px;">【环球网科技综合<span style="color: black;">报告</span>】据彭博等<span style="color: black;">媒介</span><span style="color: black;">信息</span>，<span style="color: black;">近期</span>，苹果<span style="color: black;">机构</span>因其应用商店的收费政策而受到美国<span style="color: black;">地区</span>法官的质疑。苹果<span style="color: black;">机构</span>试图证明其向<span style="color: black;">研发</span>者收取27%佣金的<span style="color: black;">恰当</span>性，该佣金针对的是在App Store之外进行的购买。然而，在法庭上，这一做法遭到了法官的严厉审视。</p><img src="https://p3-sign.toutiaoimg.com/tos-cn-i-axegupay5k/e5667173d4c6414b89231b469b01b202~noop.image?_iz=58558&from=article.pc_detail&lk3s=953192f4&x-expires=1729322773&x-signature=JLYYpiJVNnP0h2U88ktYOyaVAUc%3D" style="width: 50%; margin-bottom: 20px;">
<p style="font-size: 16px; color: black; line-height: 40px; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 15px;"><span style="color: black;">源自</span>：apple</p>
<p style="font-size: 16px; color: black; line-height: 40px; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 15px;">在加州奥克兰的美国地区法院，法官伊冯·冈萨雷斯·罗杰斯（Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers）<span style="color: black;">遵循</span>了为期四天的证词，目的在于审查苹果<span style="color: black;">机构</span><span style="color: black;">是不是</span>遵守了2021年由《堡垒之夜》制造商Epic Games提起的反垄断案件中的法院命令。该命令<span style="color: black;">需求</span>苹果<span style="color: black;">机构</span><span style="color: black;">准许</span>应用程序<span style="color: black;">研发</span>者链接到非苹果<span style="color: black;">掌控</span>的支付选项。</p>
<p style="font-size: 16px; color: black; line-height: 40px; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 15px;">在周五的听证会上，App Store业务管理高级总监卡森·奥利弗（Carson Oliver）作证<span style="color: black;">叫作</span>，苹果已聘请经济咨询<span style="color: black;">机构</span>Analysis Group Inc.来<span style="color: black;">帮助</span>制定新的购买佣金率。然而，罗杰斯法官对奥利弗的声明提出了多次质疑，<span style="color: black;">尤其</span>是关于苹果<span style="color: black;">机构</span><span style="color: black;">怎样</span>决定向<span style="color: black;">研发</span>者收取27%的佣金，用于购买App Store之外的数字商品或服务。法官指出，Analysis Group的<span style="color: black;">科研</span><span style="color: black;">表示</span>，最低的收费区间为12.3%，<span style="color: black;">因此呢</span>她询问：“你<span style="color: black;">怎样</span>证明<span style="color: black;">另一</span>15%的收费是<span style="color: black;">恰当</span>的？”</p>
<p style="font-size: 16px; color: black; line-height: 40px; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 15px;">奥利弗在作证时强调，苹果为<span style="color: black;">研发</span>者<span style="color: black;">供给</span>了<span style="color: black;">包含</span>应用程序<span style="color: black;">发掘</span>、分发、<span style="color: black;">研发</span>者工具和平台技术在内的多项服务，并声<span style="color: black;">叫作</span>苹果<span style="color: black;">机构</span><span style="color: black;">供给</span>的隐私、用户信任和安全性是其他平台<span style="color: black;">没法</span>比拟的。他还<span style="color: black;">暗示</span>，苹果<span style="color: black;">机构</span>估算的<span style="color: black;">实质</span>佣金比例低端应为17%。</p>
<p style="font-size: 16px; color: black; line-height: 40px; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 15px;">Analysis Group<span style="color: black;">经过</span>比较Microsoft Corp.、Alphabet Inc.旗下的Google、Etsy Inc.和Shopify Inc.等平台的收费，对这些服务的价值进行了估算。然而，罗杰斯法官对此<span style="color: black;">暗示</span><span style="color: black;">可疑</span>，她指出这些只是“假设”，并<span style="color: black;">无</span><span style="color: black;">实质</span>数据支持。</p>
<p style="font-size: 16px; color: black; line-height: 40px; text-align: left; margin-bottom: 15px;"><span style="color: black;">这事</span>件<span style="color: black;">诱发</span>了业界对苹果应用商店收费政策的广泛关注和讨论。<span style="color: black;">有些</span>人认为，苹果<span style="color: black;">机构</span>的收费政策可能对<span style="color: black;">研发</span>者<span style="color: black;">形成</span>不公平的<span style="color: black;">包袱</span>，而另<span style="color: black;">有些</span>人则支持苹果<span style="color: black;">机构</span>的做法，认为其<span style="color: black;">供给</span>了有价值的服务和平台支持。</p>
页:
[1]